Blackd Should be atm!

[klusbert]

CipSoft declared in early December 2010 that the ban waves going to be stopped. The reason for this is that CipSoft don't own the "catcher" itself. It's owned by an American company that got copyrights on it. The signed a two year contract for this and it's now outdated. The company want's 22.000 euro for a two year contract instead of the old one that cost 8.000 euro for a two-years-period. CipSoft is currently looking for coders to solve these problem.

Yours,

Trymo


So now they only ban people with CM's, I dont know if its true. Seem to bee true lol.

So reading this means that most bots if safe, but botting isnot safe.
Source = http://forums.tibianeobot.com/showthread.php?10972-its-been-a-long-time-since.../page3

[Hurriel]

So it seems to be. And you know why? If they cannot solve simple bugs ingame, why da heck would they be able to create their own Ban Hammer? xD
Now we just need to know if in all those numbers its included name reports, spammers, hackers and all the other things...

[klusbert]

if true the only thing they can use to ban people now, is to check up reports and confirm if he is botting. Whats bugs are ingame? I have not notice anyone.

[Crille]

Trymo is a retard, see his other posts and see how ignorant he is. Also, it's not really hard to detect most bots, so I don't see why Cipsoft would need to rent a program that does their work for them

[jonesman]

lol i doubt his friend works for them

[klusbert]

so you claim him to be a mythomaniac? I really doubt that..

[Crille]

so you claim him to be a mythomaniac? I really doubt that..

No I don't claim he has any disorder, it just seems very unlikely that what he says is true. I highly doubt someone who wants to work for Cipsoft (why else work there?) would leak such delicate info, especially if it breaks company policy which would be grounds for firing said person

edit: He also claims that sending packets is enough for a bot to be detectable, which is not true until proven otherwise (given that they are sent CORRECTLY)

[klusbert]

edit: He also claims that sending packets is enough for a bot to be detectable, which is not true until proven otherwise (given that they are sent CORRECTLY)
tRUE true.

[Hurriel]

There are no bugs now. But its not the first time that they know there are some kind of bug and they have no idea where it lies.
This year there were a couple, i remember. One on Devorvoga and another one on lightbearer quest.
I have a guide, somewhere on my computer, from a japanese (or californian? o.O) university, that explains the bot detector systems, including some mathematic formulas. It is really interesting and everything is related to the packets. I will try to find it and post the link on a new thread.

[Danivera]

Am I the only one who can't see the meaning of the thread title? xD

[Hurriel]

Nah...can't understand either xD

Found the documents. Tomorrow i will post them. Too tired to think and type xD

[klusbert]

I really like to read that. Share with us!

If this guy is right, all bots should be safe at this point. I finds it really intresting.

[kvra]

Yeah, 14.000 euros should be really big deal for a company which earns millions a year.

[klusbert]

Yes is should for a nonworking product.